An argument in favor of the use of animals in scientific studies

To see any graphs, charts, graphics, images, and quotes to which Dr. Greger may be referring, watch the above video. Drug companies are trying to make them, but phytoestrogens—natural compounds in plants, like genistein in soybeans, that are structurally similar to estrogen—appear to function as natural selective estrogen receptor modulators.

An argument in favor of the use of animals in scientific studies

We have enough problems expanding rights to all humans as it is. Emkay 1st amendment gives us all the right to say whatever we want. Prickle How is that relevant? Buddy I have no problem extending humanitarian respect and some more legal rights to apes, whales and a few other species. However, these creatures do not possess human DNA and will forever be undeniably non-human by definition, as much as we try to anthropomorphise them.

In the progressive push to extend social justice to animals, human fetuses in an advanced state of development will always be ahead of them in line.

Your anti-sex rant is off topic, buddy. Soooo sick of anti-sex fetus worshippers who feel the constant need to derail totally unrelated discussions with this crap. And you are spreading lies, it is untrue about feeling pain at 20 wks.

Expertise. Insights. Illumination.

Further, these abortions are rare and always done for medical reasons and are none of your f—ing business. Just hurl mindless insults and f-bombs as a substitute for using your brain to form an intelligent response.

This has given rise to the practice of using fetal anesthesia for surgery or invasive diagnostic procedures in utero. Amato, Analgesic Procedures in Newborns. You cannot feel anything without a nervous system. True, however the weight of scientific evidence is that after 20 weeks neural development is sufficiently advanced for pain physiology to occur.

Which is why anesthesia is now administered to late term fetuses for intra-utero surgical and diagnostic procedures. Neighbor No, that is not the concensus view. And it is a red herring, these abortions are rare and done for medical reasons. Neighbor Is it a religious thing, or do you have a Madonna-whore complex?

Get smart. Sign up for our email newsletter.

Emkay so, the fetus that has two heads or an open spine and will live in agony should be allowed to be born, and then come live with you right?? Dave Gray Those who do not wish to be slaves or vessels should probably take reasononable steps to ensure that conception does not occur.

Before you step off on me, understand that I am a pro-choice libertarian, but I also do not believe that abortion should be used as a form of birth control for those too irresponsible to use contraception not that it should be banned for them, simply that they should be educated and encouraged to make better choices so that it is not necessary.

It is much easier, safer, and less traumatic for all involved to prevent a pregnancy or implantantation than it is to terminate one due to irresponsible behavioral choices. I certainly do not wish to be on the hook for paying for those behavioral choices when they could have been prevented. The idea that you put forth that a woman is somehow a slave or an unwilling vessel to a parasite of her own making except perhaps in the case of rape is ludicrous on its face and denies basic biology for wannabe social constructs.

That number would rank as the 26th most populated country in the world, out of countries. In December, the number of people on government assistance exceeded 42 million…more than the entire population of Spain….

Fixer1 Read this allowed, and listen to yourself! Then claim all the money back that you paid for that degree. Emkay uh, sounds like you were not even aloud to go to college.

Dave Gray This is utter nonsense. Seriously, Discover, you can do better than this. Is there no peer review process for what you choose to publish here?

We have enough problems servicing the existing humans humanely under the existing definition of humanity, to dilute that definition by incorporating silicon based life forms that anybody could whip up in their garage or sentient non-human life forms on this or other planets simply provides us with greater excuses for doing less for those who are truly human — possessed of human DNA.

In Favor of Niceness, Community, and Civilization | Slate Star Codex Suggested Further Readings 1.
Philosophy Blog: Arguments against Performance-Enhancing Technologies Enos the space chimp before insertion into the Mercury-Atlas 5 capsule in This rat is being deprived of restful sleep using a single platform "flower pot" technique.
Animal testing - Wikipedia My friends call me Ape Jaw Evan.
DEPARTMENTS Domino See Slippery Slope.
It's Time to Expand Our Definition of "Human Being" - The Crux Researchers of animal behavior have arrived at different formulations. InBeck published a widely used definition of tool use.

So before you get on a progressive high horse about how this would create some wonderful utopia I suggest you consider the law of unintended consequences and the way human history has always spun towards the dark side of possibilities.

This would simply create a world where some non-human creatures would be elevated even further over the downtrodden human detritus that we currently discard, it would not lift those people up.

It would simply further push them down. Those who do not learn from history. Just that what constitutes the expansion of definition of human beings has not been made clear. Emkay I gave minutes to read this tripe, I want them back!!

Scientific studies, Scientific numerics in complex systems, beekeeping, paradigms, Michael Bush

Animal rights will lead to robot rights. Robot rights will lead to robot politicians. Robot politicians will lead to socialism. Sociology is not an empirical science and the author makes it plain that this is only posed as a thought experiment, explaining viable ways that extending rights to cognizant animals could proceed.Oct 28,  · It’s probably best to get the bad news out of the way first.

The so-called scientific method is a myth. That is not to say that scientists don’t do . PLEASE MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO: The Paw Project P.O. Box Santa Monica CA The Paw Project is a (c)(3) non-profit organization. The volunteers of The Paw Project and all of our feline friends thank you for your support!

Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, animal research and in vivo testing, is the use of non-human animals in experiments that seek to control the variables that affect the behavior or biological system under approach can be contrasted with field studies in which animals are observed in their natural environments.

Experimental research with animals . The Mind as the Software of the Brain.

An argument in favor of the use of animals in scientific studies

Ned Block New York University. 1. Machine Intelligence.

It's Time to Expand Our Definition of "Human Being" - The Crux

2. Intelligence and Intentionality. 3. Functionalism and the Language of Thought. 4. Searle's Chinese Room Argument. I have been working on a sports ethics presentation. The following is a (really) rough draft of the section of performance-enhancing technologies. Tool use by animals is a phenomenon in which an animal uses any kind of tool in order to achieve a goal such as acquiring food and water, grooming, defense, recreation or blog-mmorpg.comally thought to be a skill only possessed by humans, some tool use requires a sophisticated level of is considerable discussion about the .

Who Shouldn't Eat Soy? |